Revision of Writing a new charter from Mon, 21/02/2005 - 10:48pm

I think this stems from several reasons (not being criticized).

I think principals are important, I think the process of developing or reaching (consensus over) a principals is probably more important than the principals itself.

I don't see how one can care about the charter if he don't have an opinion about principals.

I liked that this group wants to have a charter, but I don't like how it is treated

I would have loved to see more debates and discussions about the charter.

I want as many people as possible to have a mark in the charter.

But to motivate people to participate in something we must first explain why it is important.

Which I believe is hard because it's subjective, but I will try anyway.

This wiki page will be refactored a lot, I expecting that writing down my ideas, and organizing them will consume a lot of time.

First we need to answer this, which turned out to be more complicated than I expected.

EGLUG is a thing, and this thing, needed rules to be controled and managed, and the rules needed a place to stay, and this place was called the charter.

The charter can all be the place to state the principals that guided to creation of those rules

The charter can be the statement of the direction, of our activities.

Regardless of who we are, or what we do, or why we do it, our efforts have a direction, to lead our efforts in a better direction we need a statement of this direction!

From this we can argue, that the charter should not point to a direction, that the activity is our focal point, and that the charter elaborate of the resources gathered for an activity.

So we can say, that EGLUG provides an activity environment, for all activities related to FOSS

And the charter should elaborate on the attributes of this environment.

Again, the most imporant things is not to create better rules, but to create more interest in them, and better understand in them.

The wording will be very imporant, I want to use, simple and intriguing words. For one, I believe using the word charter was a mistake, I didn't know its meaning, and think most people did not.

Even the arabic word "دستور" is still a bad choice.

Questions I believe needs a better answer or an answer.