اتفق مديري الموقع و هم
- Alaa
- MohammedSameer
- whirlpool
- Conceptor
- ezabi
على فض فريق المديرين بعد أن تبين لنا فقدان عدد كبير من الأعضاء الثقة في الفريق و بعد أن اتفقنا كلنا على فشل الفريق في القيام بمهماته الفترة السابقة.
استفتاء الرأي لا يزال أمامه 5 أيام لكن من الواضح ضرورة فض الفريق، و نأمل أن يساهم قرارنا في الاسراع بعملية اختيار فريق جديد و الانتباه لمشاكل الموقع و طلبات الأعضاء. (ملحوظة، آخر فبراير هو الموعد الطبيعي للانتخابات)
- يسمح لأي عضو قديم أن يرشح نفسه لادارة الموقع
- يسمح لأي عضو أيا كان أن يرشح نفسه لادارة الموقع
و المقترح مفتوح للمناقشة، و أفضل طريقة لتيسير النقاش الآن هي محاولة رصد كل من يرغب في ترشيح نفسه لمعرفة مدى اقبال الأعضاء الغير قدامى على الفكرة.
نحتاج أيضا لمراجعة قائمة الأعضاء للتأكد من أن قائمة الأعضاء القدامى تعبر فعلا عن مجموعة الأعضاء الناشطين وفقا للقواعد المذكورة في سياسة تصنيف الأعضاء.
Comments
يسمح لأي عضو
يسمح لأي عضو أيا كان أن يرشح نفسه لادارة الموقع
I dont accept that ..
Get my gpg key: gpg --recv-key --keyserver pgp.mit.edu 4CFE7230 Key Fingerprint: C5A6 BE2B 594A F616 E3C2 9472 AC43 3D8D 4CFE 7230
You ddnot get it
I accept it ,
The elcetion done by memmbers ,and memmebrs will choose based on activity and how much they know him/her and if he/she is active enough he/she will be at least senior ,,
So he will be able to .........
I Was Known as POSIX
can you elaborate? why you
can you elaborate? why you don't accept? what could happen if we allow that?
Alaa
"context is over-rated. who are you anyway?"
i reviewed the MCP
thats in the 1st part of the administrator section
another part فى حالة النزاع بين فريق المدرين يتم حل وفصل فريق المدرين , ويتم طلب مرشحين جدد و الاتفاق على طريقة مباشرة للتصويت لتقيم المرشحين.
dose this mean what alaa said? or it's mean the new election will be from the moderators teams el morsh7in y3ny?
peace
Live Free Or Die...
DarKnesS_WolF: The
DarKnesS_WolF: The candidates are NOT from the moderators team only .. but the moderators team + senior users ... The point is that I'm not accepting new users to have the ability to be candidates .. The senior users list IMO has a bunch of users that are fit enough to handle the responsibility ..
Get my gpg key: gpg --recv-key --keyserver pgp.mit.edu 4CFE7230 Key Fingerprint: C5A6 BE2B 594A F616 E3C2 9472 AC43 3D8D 4CFE 7230
seems i really forgot the rules
from the MCP A call for candidates is anounced among moderators.
where dose it's say from modrators + seniors users? what i know is 1st there should be a modration election some seniors will be mods. and then admins election some mods will be admins. is that wrong ?
peace
Live Free Or Die...
I second that. WWW: The
I second that.
we need to fix a few
we need to fix a few things in the arabic version.
anyways the normal rules state that only mods can run as admins.
but what I'm saying is the admin team resigned, we are running the website now on a temporary basis and it shouldn't last for very long.
waiting for mod elections, then admin elections is just too much.
so I'm suggesting we start with admin elections, and allow a broader set of users to run, so far sameer and cvirus agree that this should be done but that the broader set should include seniors only.
I asked for anyone interested in running to say it so we can measure how many non seniors want, if none want then it's not worth discussing it.
anyways, the goal is to move forward fast.
Alaa
"context is over-rated. who are you anyway?"
seniors + mods
seniors + mods
seniors + mods will be
seniors + mods will be fair.
Diaa Radwan
If any member is allowed
If any member is allowed to run then it will get out of control and we'll end up with at least 60% of the LUG memebers as candidates .. It should be limited to seniors + mods I guess ..
Get my gpg key: gpg --recv-key --keyserver pgp.mit.edu 4CFE7230 Key Fingerprint: C5A6 BE2B 594A F616 E3C2 9472 AC43 3D8D 4CFE 7230
ok seniors+mods+admins
ok seniors+mods+admins seems likely to gain more consensus can we start the call for candidates now?
Alaa
"context is over-rated. who are you anyway?"
Wait until more people
Wait until more people post their opinions.
mods+ seniors
mods+seniors+admins
I Was Known as POSIX
mods+seniors+admins
Let's get names for those who want to run. I suggest excetpions can be made for members proving their technical abilities. Complain, do nothing, get your free Patagonian identity.
how we can judge?
technical abilities is not the only criteria ,I think it should be some thing like how he/she attached to this community and how active he/she is?
one more obstacles if we will have exceptions : who will judge on the tech. thing? and on which basis also ?
to cut it in short let's make it seniors and mods.
Diaa Radwan
mods + seniors + admins
- I'm a code junkie security enthusiast
Lets start it Get
Lets start it
Get my gpg key: gpg --recv-key --keyserver pgp.mit.edu 4CFE7230 Key Fingerprint: C5A6 BE2B 594A F616 E3C2 9472 AC43 3D8D 4CFE 7230
mods + seniors
mods + seniors + admins
mods + seniors + admins
ya gama3a can we just
ya gama3a can we just start accepting candidates.
no non senior expressed interest and no one posted saying it is a good idea, so let's just start.
Alaa
"context is over-rated. who are you anyway?"
go ahead
- I'm a code junkie security enthusiast
What we are waiting
What we are waiting for?
Diaa Radwan